Meizu Pro 6S is unsurprising on Antutu


meizu pro 6 pink and red

On November 3rd Meizu will be launching the Meizu Pro 6S, possibly the least exciting Meizu to date.

Don’t get us wrong, Meizu do still make some nice phones, but the Meizu Pro 6S appears to be a little underwhelming. According to all the latest leaks, the Meizu Pro 6S will feature a very similar design to the current metal Pro 6, and VP of Meizu Li Nan has already confirmed it will ship with the same chipset.

So with those details already known it’s over to Antutu to fill in the blanks.

The Antutu benchmarks for the phone lists the Pro 6S with an FHD 1920 x 1080 display, Mediatek Helio X25 chipset, 4GB RAM, 32GB internal memory, 21-mega-pixel main camera, and 5-megapixel snapper for selfies.

Gizchina News of the week


screen-shot-2016-10-28-at-10-21-12-am

So, all in all, it’s looking like there are no updates to be found on the Pro 6S, in fact, once the Pro 6S launches the pricing for the current Pro 6 are likely to drop despite offering the same design and hardware!!

There’s always a chance that there will be a hidden feature. Perhaps a larger battery or the inclusion of a second battery, but so far this is looking rather unlikely.

Previous Budget Bluboo Boasts NFC!!
Next UMi Diamond, another durable UMi phone

28 Comments

  1. lolipop
    October 28, 2016

    This is strange… why are they doing such a bad move? They should stay with Exynos prozessors, making their phones compatible with more frequencies, making stable os. I always liked their designs, but know it looks like they are totally obsessed with apple. They need to do their own thing. I mean: giving the title “6s”…. come on… . Xiaomi seems to do right now. I think the Mi Mix is an impressive move. I am looking for a review!!!

    • Lazar Prodanovic
      October 28, 2016

      Actually MTK cellular modems are worldwide compatible (support all frequencies) wile Samsung ones aren’t.

      • October 28, 2016

        That’s arguable. QC modems support the most frequencies.
        Usually MTK devices from China tend to support FD 1,2,3,5,7(20 if you are lucky) 37,38,39,40.
        Exynos devices are very few and Samsung phones are more expensive, their modems are basically up to par with MTK ones, but freq support is more focuses on US and EU bands.

        • Lazar Prodanovic
          October 28, 2016

          Nothing to argue there about.
          QC is still a leader, followed by HiSilicon, then Samsung & everyone else. Samsung is still not a world wide regarding band support. You actually pay a fee for included bands that’s why you don’t have them all on supported hardware.

    • balcobomber25
      October 28, 2016

      The reason they didn’t use Exnyos was because of frequencies. The latest Exnyos chip doesn’t have full support for Chinese networks, MTK does. That is the same reason Galaxy phones in China use a SD820.

      • yalok
        October 28, 2016

        That’s clear, but I wonder if they would’ve made more profit if they chose Exynos..

  2. Kike Corral
    October 28, 2016

    does not make sense…. it’s actually the same phone thna PRO6… why the hell they wanted to do that?

  3. xi7
    October 28, 2016

    another overshadowed by mix 🙂

  4. MattD
    October 28, 2016

    Mark my words: it’s a yunos powered device with ~200/300 more mah on the battery!
    Let’s see if I got it right ?

  5. Guest
    October 28, 2016

    This is strange… why are they doing such a bad move? They should stay with Exynos prozessors, making their phones compatible with more frequencies, making stable os. I always liked their designs, but know it looks like they are totally obsessed with apple. They need to do their own thing. I mean: giving the title “6s”…. come on… . Xiaomi seems to do right now. I think the Mi Mix is an impressive move. I am looking for a review!!!

    • Lazar Prodanovic
      October 28, 2016

      Actually MTK cellular modems are worldwide compatible (support all frequencies) wile Samsung ones aren’t.

    • balcobomber25
      October 28, 2016

      The reason they didn’t use Exnyos was because of frequencies. The latest Exnyos chip doesn’t have full support for Chinese networks, MTK does. That is the same reason Galaxy phones in China use a SD820.

    • yalok
      October 28, 2016

      That’s clear, but I wonder if they would’ve made more profit if they chose Exynos..

    • Steven Fox
      October 28, 2016

      That’s arguable. QC modems support the most frequencies.
      Usually MTK devices from China tend to support FD 1,2,3,5,7(20 if you are lucky) 37,38,39,40.
      Exynos devices are very few and Samsung phones are more expensive, their modems are basically up to par with MTK ones, but freq support is more focuses on US and EU bands.

    • Lazar Prodanovic
      October 28, 2016

      Nothing to argue there about.
      QC is still a leader, followed by HiSilicon, then Samsung & everyone else. Samsung is still not a world wide regarding band support. You actually pay a fee for included bands that’s why you don’t have them all on supported hardware.

  6. balcobomber25
    October 28, 2016

    The only thing I could think of is an updated camera, battery and maybe international LTE bands. It seems like they are releasing a new phone, just to release a new phone.

  7. Dab
    October 28, 2016

    I am just wondering why Pro 5 is still so expensive, sometimes more that Pro 6

    • illystor
      October 28, 2016

      Well, it’s still easily a better device.

  8. Kike Corral
    October 28, 2016

    does not make sense…. it’s actually the same phone thna PRO6… why the hell they wanted to do that?

  9. xi7
    October 28, 2016

    another overshadowed by The Concept Smartphone 🙂

  10. MattD
    October 28, 2016

    Mark my words: it’s a yunos powered device with ~200/300 more mah on the battery!
    Let’s see if I got it right 😁

  11. Stiffmah
    October 28, 2016

    Maybe it:s a bigger version?

  12. balcobomber25
    October 28, 2016

    The only thing I could think of is an updated camera, battery and maybe international LTE bands. It seems like they are releasing a new phone, just to release a new phone.

  13. Dab
    October 28, 2016

    I am just wondering why Pro 5 is still so expensive, sometimes more that Pro 6

    • illystor
      October 28, 2016

      Well, it’s still easily a better device.

  14. Stiffmah
    October 28, 2016

    Maybe it:s a bigger version?

  15. Adam Irvine
    October 29, 2016

    Ye, it looks very much like Meizu is struggling to give a sh1t about this one…

  16. Adam Irvine
    October 29, 2016

    Ye, it looks very much like Meizu is struggling to give a sh1t about this one…