Battery Obsession: Is It Really Necessary? Exploring the Truth


Smartphone Battery

¬†Acknowledging the significance of the battery as a crucial technical component in a mobile phone is something I don’t contest, and I doubt I’ll ever dispute it. Nevertheless, both personally and within my surroundings, there has been a noticeable fixation on each of the essential aspects of batteries that, in my view, seems excessive.

The health of the battery, particularly among iOS users, stands out as one of the most worrisome factors. Additionally, considerations like capacity and autonomy are significant. While these aspects hold importance, they may not be determinative in all cases. And there may be instances where excessive obsession is unwarranted.

While capacity holds significance, it is not the sole determining factor

I’ll begin with what I consider a pivotal aspect: the technical data pertaining to the mAh capacity of the battery. While some devices boast higher capacities, the current average rests at 5,000 mAh across various ranges. With many devices hovering around the 4,500 mAh mark. Exceptions include foldables or compact mobiles, where such capacities are less common.

Certainly, a robust capacity typically ensures extended autonomy. However, there are other factors at play. For instance, an efficient processor in terms of battery consumption, coupled with energy efficiency, plays a crucial role in maintaining a stable 5,000 mAh. Preventing adverse effects such as elevated temperatures that might otherwise degrade the battery.

In addition to battery capacity, the management of the battery by the operating system and processor is equally crucial.

The operating system plays a significant role. In the case of iPhones, despite their stringent approach to background apps, iOS is known for effective battery management. Allowing Apple to incorporate battery capacities that, on average, tend to be lower than those of its competitors. However, it’s worth noting that within the Android ecosystem, there are variations in the efficiency of different layers.

Another factor to consider is the intended usage. Each day is unique, and having a phone with a sizable capacity, an efficient chipset, and adept system management can provide peace of mind. Nevertheless, your daily routine might not necessitate extensive battery life as a general rule.

In essence, if your usage patterns don’t typically lead to significant battery drainage, opting for a high-capacity phone may not be critical. Instead, you might find a more suitable option with a smaller capacity that excels in other areas such as camera performance and, notably, a compact size.

Dispelling the myths surrounding batteries is not a complex task

Gizchina News of the week


Having dedicated several years to the professional analysis of smartphone technology, I must admit that even specialists occasionally harbor doubts about the purported negative impacts of certain actions on battery life. If this uncertainty can arise among experts, one can imagine its prevalence among the general public.

Among the various myths surrounding smartphone batteries, one particularly sensitive one asserts that “using non-original chargers doesn’t matter much.” This notion is not entirely baseless.

While it’s true that you don’t always need to stick to the original charger or a specific brand, it’s crucial to avoid using just any charger solely based on its affordability. The price factor often leads individuals to opt for inexpensive power adapters and cables. But it’s worth noting that not all affordable options are of high quality.

Ensuring that chargers adhere to quality standards is vital to secure safe charging. Guarding against power grid interference and potential overvoltages. Additionally, activating the mobile phone’s settings to facilitate efficient charging, which collaborates closely with the cable, is advisable. The cable should have the capacity to supply only the necessary energy for a specified duration.

All chargers are not created equal, and while official ones from the manufacturer are not always obligatory, it is essential to verify that they carry a quality certification.

Another aspect to consider is the potential adverse effects of fast charging. While prolonged use of this feature may expedite battery deterioration, striking a balance by employing regular charging practices is a more prudent approach. However, if your phone supports fast charging, it would be unwise not to leverage this capability when circumstances demand a swift recharge in emergencies.

The displayed battery health percentage may not always accurately reflect the actual condition of the battery

A few years back, iOS introduced the feature allowing users to monitor the battery health of iPhones, which, in my view, triggered a somewhat unhealthy obsession with maintaining a 100% battery health for as long as possible. I speak from firsthand knowledge, having observed friends and acquaintances closely monitoring this metric almost as if their lives depended on it. It’s worth noting that Android users also have the option to track battery health through apps. Though the same level of obsession doesn’t seem as prevalent among Android users.

The reality is that determining and representing battery health as a percentage is a complex task. We are aware that batteries naturally degrade over time, and certain actions can expedite this process. However, frequently checking this data may not offer much utility beyond creating unnecessary concerns.

It’s crucial to consider battery health only when anomalies arise. Such as a sudden and significant decline in battery life or after a couple of years of usage. In such cases, seeking assistance from a technical service to examine the device for potential manufacturing defects in the battery is advisable.

Having the on-screen battery percentage display may not always be advantageous

The decision to display the on-screen battery percentage is a highly personal matter that doesn’t concern me personally. However, there has been some debate over whether showing the percentage on the screen is beneficial, especially with its return to the iPhone. My stance on this is clear: I prefer not to know. And I base this decision on arguments similar to those I mentioned regarding battery health.

While knowing the remaining battery is important, it can already be reasonably anticipated with the icon displayed at the top of the screen. After all, what substantial difference does it make to be aware of having 60% versus 61% battery? Familiarity with our smartphone’s behavior, indicated by the icon’s level of fullness, allows us to gauge whether we need to keep the charger nearby or if we can comfortably proceed.

I have experienced this dynamic, particularly with the iPhone’s reintroduction of the battery percentage in iOS 16. Initially appreciated as an option, I found myself becoming more preoccupied with it. Since opting to remove it, I have found a greater sense of peace. Trust me, not having the percentage constantly in sight has not led to any instances of running out of battery for me.

Disclaimer: We may be compensated by some of the companies whose products we talk about, but our articles and reviews are always our honest opinions. For more details, you can check out our editorial guidelines and learn about how we use affiliate links.

Source/VIA :
Previous Unlock the Hidden Value: Don't Throw Away Your Old Android Phones
Next Exynos 2400 of Galaxy S24 Edges Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 In Gaming