More purported leaked Antutu benchmarks from China claim the Samsung Galaxy S5 does have a 2K display after all!
Samsungās Galaxy S5 is one of the most talked about Android smartphones of the moment and as such leaks and purported specifications have been a common feature in the headlines. This isnāt the first time purported Antutu scores of the Samsung Galaxy S5 have appeared, but this time specs are different again an include a higher resolution display!
According to these Antutu benchmarks, the Galaxy S5 aka Samsung SM-G900R4 has a 1440p display (2560 x 1440 resolution), Snapdragon 800 quad-core CPU, 3GB RAM , 32GB memory, 2 megapixel front camera and 16 megapixel rear.
Gizchina News of the week
These Antutu scores arenāt to say the previous leaks were false, sources close to Samsung say that there will be various versions of the S5 including a 1080p display model and ale an Exynos 5422 version of the phone. In fact the Samsung Galaxy S5 could well be a truly global device with versions available for all major markets.
Here are the leaked Samsung Galaxy S5 serial numbers and the countries they will be available in;
- SM-G9006V_CHN_CHN (China)
- SM-G9008V_CHN_ZM (China)
- SM-G9009D_CHN_CTC (China)
- SM-G900A_NA_ATT (AT & T)
- SM-G900D_JPN_DCM (Japan)
- SM-G900F_EUR_XX (Europe)
- SM-G900H_EUR_XX (Europe)
- SM-G900I_SEA_XSA (Asia)
- SM-G900J_JPN_KDI (Japan)
- SM-G900K_KOR_KTC (South Korea)
- SM-G900L_KOR_LGT (South Korea)
- SM-G900M_LA_VF (Vodafone)
- SM-G900P_NA_SPR (Sprint)
- SM-G900R4_NA_USC (US Cellular)
- SM-G900S_KOR_SKC (South Korea)
- SM-G900T_NA_TMB (T-Mobile)
- SM-G900V_NA_VZW (Verizon)
- SM-G900W8_NA_BMC (BMC)
We will keep our eyes on the latest Samsung Galaxy S5 news and rumours and will keep you updated!
Basically a slower, smaller note 3. I wonder why Samsung even bothers. I mean clearly 1080p is the most the human eye can see on phones and upping the resolution without upping the rest of the specs can spell disaster. As I said, a slower smaller note 3, is there anyone that would want to buy sth that is already worse than something else released half a year ago?
that was said with 720p too
Indeed 1080p made no difference in sub 5inchers. It’s only that phones -as of late- went close to 6 inches where 1080p matters.
For
1440p to start to matter we’d have to climb close to 8 inch phones, for
anything below that it’s a waste of bandwidth/res, the human eye cannot
perceive it.
Do you think that we are going to have 8-inch
phones anytime soon? If yes, then indeed the move to 1440p makes sense,
if not it’s idiotic…
So 540p, 720p, 1080p, 1440p
In short 1440p is great for anywhere between 8 and 10 inch tablets, it’s atrocious for phones…
i don’t think so because huger devices means less comfort in your trousers and hands… higher resolutions are made because it is fairly easy for the manufacteurer to produce such tiny screens without huge failure rates compared to large TV panels
the only logic behind this is buzzwords to convince the customer that you get a device with more specs than the older one because the flagship market is crowded and you need something to push through and thats only possible with “cutting edge” specs
meh,not exactly exciting….