ViewSonic V500 Review


ViewSonic is a name that you would usually associate with LCD monitors, perhaps from the past. If you weren’t aware, the company also does smartphone, and the V500 happens to be one of them.

The V500 is very much an entry-level to mid-range device. That is exactly the category that has seen a boom in the recent months; no one’s really spending US$500-600 to get a flagship phone anymore, or so it appears.

The ViewSonic V500 comes with a 5.5-inch full HD display, and is powered by the Snapdragon 400 SoC. How good is the phone? Let’s find that out in the ViewSonic V500 review!

ViewSonic V500 Review: Design

ViewSonic V500 (9)

There’s hardly anything to say about the design of this phone, for it’s a phone with a very generic bar-ish design. It does come with a couple of rear covers that try to add to the style quotient, however.

The front of the phone is covered in glass (no mention of Gorilla Glass here), with the most space obviously being taken by the 5.5-inch 1080p panel. The setting is usual, nothing out of the ordinary; an earpiece on top (next to the usual suite of sensors), a 2 mega-pixel front camera and below the screen, the three capacitive buttons. Since this is a KitKat phone, the leftmost capacitive button is for accessing the menu rather than recent apps.

ViewSonic V500 (10)

Despite lacking Gorilla Glass, the screen coating on the V500 seems robust enough to be used without a screen protector. Through the weeks of usage I’m yet to encounter a scratch on the screen, so I assume it is perfectly safe to use it without a screen protector.

ViewSonic V500 (11)

The most impressive bit about the V500 is the metal lip around the screen. Phones that sell for around US$100 hardly feature any metal, and the ones that do hardly are generous with usage. The case here is different, and the V500 is made with a nice chunky yet stylish metal edge, with a glossy coating.

The edges of the phone besides the metal are made up of an impressive rubbery-plastic combo material, which give you a nice grip when the phone is held in the hands. The rear, as mentioned, comes in two options — one with the same rubbery coating, and the other with a faux leather texture. I found the latter to be plain hideous.

ViewSonic V500 (17)

Taking off the rear is simple, you only need something to pry at it with. When you do that, the 2500mAh battery slot, 2x SIM slots and a microSD card slot are exposed. Nothing too fancy in here, and the speaker too is a simple single driver at the center below the battery slot.

The camera with its single LED flash is found on the top left of the chassis. The camera does poke out of the body ever so slightly, but nothing to worry about.

ViewSonic V500 Review: Screen

Welcome to the section where you’ll read about the best part of the ViewSonic V500. Yes, the display on the phone is a treat… and that shouldn’t be a surprise for ViewSonic has been in the display business for a long while. Although the V500 doesn’t really have the same sized panel as the monitors that the company makes, it does however have the same display quality.

The screen is a 5.5-inch 1080p unit. Colors are really natural on the panel, far away from the supersaturated ones of a Super AMOLED screen. The resolution on offer — 1080p — is quite impressive too when you consider that the phone sells for US$110.

Gizchina News of the week


Viewing angles are up to par and it’s in all a very nice display. Brightness is satisfactory, but the reflective front glass of the phone means that it can sometimes be a problem when used outdoors.

The bezels are surprisingly narrow also, perhaps only a little thicker than the bezel-less Le 1 (of course it isn’t bezel-less). Like mentioned, the screen is easily the most impressive bit on the V500.

ViewSonic V500 Review: Performance

In the age of 64-bit octa-core chips, the Snapdragon 400 certainly sounds lacklustre. Unfortunately, that shows in real life usage also. First, it is disappointing that the phone ships only with Android KitKat and not Lollipop. MediaTek phones which often find themselves criticized for not having Android updates come with Lollipop, so there’s no excuse for having a KitKat system on the V500. I’m not sure how popular the V500 is going to be, so there’s no promise of a killer community support for this one also.

The system is still OK-ish for 2D and general UI, but it is really poor for 3D where the effects of an old SoC become more apparent.

Here’s how the phone performs at benchmarks:

  • AnTuTu: 17032
  • Quadrant Standard: 7983
  • Vellamo Browser: 857
  • Vellamo Metal: 738
  • Vellamo Multicore: 912

ViewSonic V500 Review: Camera

ViewSonic V500 (8)

Smartphone cameras have come a long way, and it isn’t the flagships, but the entry-level to mid-range phones like the V500 that are representative of this fact. The V500 has a 13 mega-pixel camera that could do with better dynamic ranging, but for what it costs, the phone does a great job.

HDR mode deserves a special mention. HDR has saved quite a few otherwise-sub-standard camera phones, but on the V500 it adds to the overall appeal. That said, you must know that the camera app isn’t the fastest, and HDR especially can be really slow.

Take a look at some samples.

ViewSonic V500 Review: Radio

Screenshot_2015-06-15-23-56-50_result-7

Another department where the V500 shines. 4G LTE connectivity is one of the phone’s USPs, and along with that, the V500 does very good cellular connectivity (ex-4G) and has a brilliant WiFi performance. GPS too is up to par, and in fact better than some other phones in the sub-US$150 range we have tested.

ViewSonic V500 Review: Battery

ViewSonic V500 (16)

The V500 is a very average phone all round, and the battery part is no different. The 2500mAh battery of the device is enough for around 4-4.5 hours of screen on time. This is a figure that I’ve established with my general usage which includes email, Facebook, WhatsApp, and a lot of Chrome besides some other productivity apps and virtually no gaming. Gaming will reduce the battery life by quite a bit, and the V500 anyway doesn’t have enough grunt in it to provide for your games. I would’ve liked to see a better battery performance from the V500, but it is possible to make do with what’s on offer.

ViewSonic V500 Review: Audio

The V500 comes with a decent earpiece but the loudspeaker is below par. Audio quality from the earpiece is pretty satisfactory, but it does lack volume. The loudspeaker though, lacks a LOT of volume. It would be fair to say that the loudspeaker is simply of no use — you would use it only in a noisy environment and given the audio output it produces, it won’t really be of much help, only embarrassment.

ViewSonic V500 Review:  Conclusion

One word to describe the V500 would be — ‘fair’. That because the phone does nothing special, but yet somehow manages to be worthy of the asking price. There are, however, better phones in the range — one that comes to mind is the Elephone P6000 which is a brilliant phone for the money. However, if you are among those that worry about brand names, then the V500 could probably make for a decent choice.

Thanks to CooliCool.com for providing the ViewSonic V500 for review.

Previous Wickedleak Wammy Note 4 goes on sale in India, reminds us of the JiaYu S3
Next Huawei TalkBand B2 now selling for a starting price of $135

27 Comments

  1. claude
    June 15, 2015

    THERE R SO MANY INTERESTING PHONES TO TEST .. WHY U CHOOSE A SO SHITTY ONE .? (at my opinion )

    • Muhammad Yasir
      June 15, 2015

      maybe because they were too distracted by the E3 2015 to make a sensible choice :p

    • Muhammad Yasir
      June 15, 2015

      maybe because they were too distracted by the E3 2015 to make a sensible choice :p

    • June 15, 2015

      LOL … I was thinking same thing … lol

    • Rookie
      June 15, 2015

      I will say it again, ANDY!!!! Lenovo Vibe shot please with sugar on top!

    • Rookie
      June 15, 2015

      I will say it again, ANDY!!!! Lenovo Vibe shot please with sugar on top!

    • Roger
      June 20, 2015

      Becuase it’s very cheap – you can buy for $100. I’m sure there a plenty of people like myself who only have a very lmited budget to spend on a phone, who really like seeing reviews of cheap phones like this one.

  2. Filippo Dardi
    June 15, 2015

    Snapdragon 400… And a 1080p screen?
    Sounds strange.

  3. Muhammad Yasir
    June 15, 2015

    cam is shit… nuff said

  4. Muhammad Yasir
    June 15, 2015

    cam is shit… nuff said

  5. Guest
    June 15, 2015

    THERE R SO MANY INTERESTING PHONES TO TEST .. WHY U CHOOSE A SO SHITTY ONE .? (at my opinion )

    • Guest
      June 15, 2015

      maybe because they were too distracted by the E3 2015 to make a sensible choice :p

    • Michael Ogbonnaya
      June 15, 2015

      LOL … I was thinking same thing … lol

    • Guest
      June 16, 2015

      I will say it again, ANDY!!!! Lenovo Vibe shot please with sugar on top!

  6. Filippo Dardi
    June 15, 2015

    Snapdragon 400… And a 1080p screen?
    Sounds strange.

  7. Guest
    June 15, 2015

    cam is shit… nuff said

  8. Steven Fox
    June 16, 2015

    I’d say that the phone sounds nice for about 100$.
    They could have gone with a 720p 5inch screen, to cut costs and extend battery life. Overall you didn’t mention anything really negative.
    I say this is a good buy for someone looking for their first smartphone, or a spare.

  9. Steven Fox
    June 16, 2015

    I’d say that the phone sounds nice for about 100$.
    They could have gone with a 720p 5inch screen, to cut costs and extend battery life. Overall you didn’t mention anything really negative.
    I say this is a good buy for someone looking for their first smartphone, or a spare.

  10. Steven Fox
    June 16, 2015

    I’d say that the phone sounds nice for about 100$.
    They could have gone with a 720p 5inch screen, to cut costs and extend battery life. Overall you didn’t mention anything really negative.
    I say this is a good buy for someone looking for their first smartphone, or a spare.

  11. Riccardo Benzoni
    June 16, 2015

    when you have a “weak and old” SoC and a fullhd resolution… you can’t expect anything good in terms of performance and usability, this seems the case here unfortunately.

    • Filippo Dardi
      September 30, 2015

      He should be scared.

      • Riccardo Benzoni
        September 30, 2015

        he really should be!

  12. Riccardo Benzoni
    June 16, 2015

    when you have a “weak and old” SoC and a fullhd resolution… you can’t expect anything good in terms of performance and usability, this seems the case here unfortunately.

    • Filippo Dardi
      September 30, 2015

      He should be scared.

    • Riccardo Benzoni
      September 30, 2015

      he really should be!

  13. Valentín Mastache
    August 29, 2015

    I just received this phone from DX. I don’t care about 4G but every single store says that it will work on 3G WCDMA 850 but it’s a lie! The phone is TD-SCDMA. Is there any chance it can be enable WCDMA 850?

  14. Valentín Mastache
    August 29, 2015

    I just received this phone from DX. I don’t care about 4G but every single store says that it will work on 3G WCDMA 850 but it’s a lie! The phone is TD-SCDMA. Is there any chance it can be enable WCDMA 850?