On November 3rd Meizu will be launching the Meizu Pro 6S, possibly the least exciting Meizu to date.
Don’t get us wrong, Meizu do still make some nice phones, but the Meizu Pro 6S appears to be a little underwhelming. According to all the latest leaks, the Meizu Pro 6S will feature a very similar design to the current metal Pro 6, and VP of Meizu Li Nan has already confirmed it will ship with the same chipset.
So with those details already known it’s over to Antutu to fill in the blanks.
The Antutu benchmarks for the phone lists the Pro 6S with an FHD 1920 x 1080 display, Mediatek Helio X25 chipset, 4GB RAM, 32GB internal memory, 21-mega-pixel main camera, and 5-megapixel snapper for selfies.
Gizchina News of the week
So, all in all, it’s looking like there are no updates to be found on the Pro 6S, in fact, once the Pro 6S launches the pricing for the current Pro 6 are likely to drop despite offering the same design and hardware!!
There’s always a chance that there will be a hidden feature. Perhaps a larger battery or the inclusion of a second battery, but so far this is looking rather unlikely.
This is strange… why are they doing such a bad move? They should stay with Exynos prozessors, making their phones compatible with more frequencies, making stable os. I always liked their designs, but know it looks like they are totally obsessed with apple. They need to do their own thing. I mean: giving the title “6s”…. come on… . Xiaomi seems to do right now. I think the Mi Mix is an impressive move. I am looking for a review!!!
Actually MTK cellular modems are worldwide compatible (support all frequencies) wile Samsung ones aren’t.
That’s arguable. QC modems support the most frequencies.
Usually MTK devices from China tend to support FD 1,2,3,5,7(20 if you are lucky) 37,38,39,40.
Exynos devices are very few and Samsung phones are more expensive, their modems are basically up to par with MTK ones, but freq support is more focuses on US and EU bands.
Nothing to argue there about.
QC is still a leader, followed by HiSilicon, then Samsung & everyone else. Samsung is still not a world wide regarding band support. You actually pay a fee for included bands that’s why you don’t have them all on supported hardware.
The reason they didn’t use Exnyos was because of frequencies. The latest Exnyos chip doesn’t have full support for Chinese networks, MTK does. That is the same reason Galaxy phones in China use a SD820.
That’s clear, but I wonder if they would’ve made more profit if they chose Exynos..
does not make sense…. it’s actually the same phone thna PRO6… why the hell they wanted to do that?
another overshadowed by mix π
Mark my words: it’s a yunos powered device with ~200/300 more mah on the battery!
Let’s see if I got it right ?
This is strange… why are they doing such a bad move? They should stay with Exynos prozessors, making their phones compatible with more frequencies, making stable os. I always liked their designs, but know it looks like they are totally obsessed with apple. They need to do their own thing. I mean: giving the title “6s”…. come on… . Xiaomi seems to do right now. I think the Mi Mix is an impressive move. I am looking for a review!!!
Actually MTK cellular modems are worldwide compatible (support all frequencies) wile Samsung ones aren’t.
The reason they didn’t use Exnyos was because of frequencies. The latest Exnyos chip doesn’t have full support for Chinese networks, MTK does. That is the same reason Galaxy phones in China use a SD820.
That’s clear, but I wonder if they would’ve made more profit if they chose Exynos..
That’s arguable. QC modems support the most frequencies.
Usually MTK devices from China tend to support FD 1,2,3,5,7(20 if you are lucky) 37,38,39,40.
Exynos devices are very few and Samsung phones are more expensive, their modems are basically up to par with MTK ones, but freq support is more focuses on US and EU bands.
Nothing to argue there about.
QC is still a leader, followed by HiSilicon, then Samsung & everyone else. Samsung is still not a world wide regarding band support. You actually pay a fee for included bands that’s why you don’t have them all on supported hardware.
The only thing I could think of is an updated camera, battery and maybe international LTE bands. It seems like they are releasing a new phone, just to release a new phone.
I am just wondering why Pro 5 is still so expensive, sometimes more that Pro 6
Well, it’s still easily a better device.
does not make sense…. it’s actually the same phone thna PRO6… why the hell they wanted to do that?
another overshadowed by The Concept Smartphone π
Mark my words: it’s a yunos powered device with ~200/300 more mah on the battery!
Let’s see if I got it right π
Maybe it:s a bigger version?
The only thing I could think of is an updated camera, battery and maybe international LTE bands. It seems like they are releasing a new phone, just to release a new phone.
I am just wondering why Pro 5 is still so expensive, sometimes more that Pro 6
Well, it’s still easily a better device.
Maybe it:s a bigger version?
Ye, it looks very much like Meizu is struggling to give a sh1t about this one…
Ye, it looks very much like Meizu is struggling to give a sh1t about this one…