UMI Max in first pictures – gallery


UMI are pretty proud about their upcoming UMI Max model and especially the marketing department is treating it as the only spoiled child.

According to the legend the resulting design of the device is the combined effort of the designers, engineers and all the UMI employees altogether. To support this quite wild claim they have released the alleged picture of the first design sketch. Wel not so sure about that myself, but take a look.

Let’s rather look at the pictures, you can see the front panel of UMI Max is clad in black with only the home button quick sticking out. Hmmmm looks like we have already seen it somewhere…Those guessing Nubia brand get 10 points.

Gizchina News of the week


The back panel looks quite ordinary so no revolution there at all, but still somewhat still pretty elegant. UMI Max looks like a pretty nice phone and with the special color variants Champagne Gold and Elegant Grey the options are even better.

At least we already know the UMI Max is going to be equipped with the Mediatek Helio P10 processor (MT6755) and Android 6.0 Marshmallow.

Previous MT6737-powered Leagoo T1 Plus on pre-sale now for $109.99
Next Vernee Mars released pics show ultra-narrow bezels and super thin metal unibody design

6 Comments

  1. mf1gt3r
    August 8, 2016

    Has there been any sh*t Umi pooed that they weren’t proud of?

  2. mitar1982
    August 8, 2016

    Back is Le1 Pro with fingerprint scanner.

  3. Candy Baker
    August 9, 2016

    I love this smartphone because it has the same look as the umi super but is cheaper than super.

  4. Emilio Calvo
    August 9, 2016

    The design is really beautiful

  5. Muhammad Yasir
    August 9, 2016

    promising concept… if the hardware implementation is even a bit off tho , it won’t count for piss

  6. Sirus Valencia
    August 9, 2016

    For some reason, it looks a bit better design wise than the Super.

    I guess the very slight differences in design (antenna lines) are more appealing to me.

    Specwise it’s exactly the same, but it’s significantly cheaper